Head Lines
    Headlines
  • Cawston Press launches flavoured sparkling water range
  • "What Happened Was Unfair": Ex-India Star's Stunning Remark On Sanju Samson
  • US President Donald Trump Wants 'Nicki Minaj-Style Nails', Expert Shares Why They Can Be A Health Disaster
  • When traffic dictates your address: How Bengaluru’s congestion is shaping real estate choices
  • "We Feel Ashamed": Pak PM On "Begging For Money" Around The World
  • Pakistan-Bangladesh direct flights resume after 14 years: All you need to know about flight schedule and operations

Kerala counted its 2026 assembly votes on Monday, with the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) sweeping back to power and the IUML winning 22 of the 27 seats it contested.Thiruvananthapuram:

In February 1957, two days before Kerala went to the polls, Jawaharlal Nehru, the-then Prime Minister, stood at Kozhikode and delivered his verdict on the Indian Union Muslim League. The speech is preserved in the selected works of Jawaharlal Nehru, Volume 37, archived from All India Radio tapes at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library. Its title was "Equal Opportunities for All."

"We attained freedom," Nehru told the Kozhikode crowd, "and the Muslim League then departed and went off to Pakistan. But surprisingly, it has left a little bit of its tail in Malabar."

He was not finished. The lone IUML Member of Parliament, B Pocker Sahib, was dismissed as "an odd singular person, lost in the Parliament House because he is isolated from everybody else." The Praja Socialist Party's electoral alliance with the IUML was "a strange marriage of socialism with communalism, and out of such strange marriages there can only be illegitimate offsprings." The League itself, Nehru told the Muslims of Malabar to their faces, "is just ploughing the sand."

Weeks later, after the Kerala election results, Nehru went further. Addressing the AICC General Body, he gave the IUML's parent organisation its historical epitaph: "This malady was given birth to by the Muslim League in the old days."

Communalism in Indian politics, the Prime Minister said, had a single point of origin. He named the party.

Nehru, it is widely reported, even termed the Muslim League a "dead horse".

A young League leader named CH Mohammed Koya, then rising through the ranks, gave the only reply the moment allowed. "The Muslim League is a sleeping lion," he said. "Its roar is about to be heard in this subcontinent."

 

60 years later, Kerala counted its assembly votes and the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) swept back to power, with the ally IUML winning 22 of the 27 seats it contested.

How IUML Was Written Off

This is the story of how a party born in partition's wreckage, abandoned by Mohammad Ali Jinnah, rejected by Nehru, and written off by everyone, built the most durable political machine in Kerala's history. And how an Islamic scholarly body founded to fight a theological argument became the engine underneath it.

To understand March 10, 1948, the foundation day of League, one has to understand December 1947.

In Karachi, at the final council session of the All India Muslim League, Jinnah addressed the Indian Muslim members before departing for his new country, Pakistan.

Mohamed Raza Khan, a prominent Leaguer from Madras, now Chennai, who was in that room, recorded what happened in his 1969 memoir "What Price Freedom". The constitutional historian AG Noorani later cited Khan's account in "Criterion Quarterly" (2008) to make a point that cuts to the heart of the IUML's origin: Jinnah and his colleagues did not, in that final session, prioritise the interests of the 40 million Muslims they were leaving behind in India. Pakistan's interests came first.

Muhammad Ismail walked out of Karachi as the elected convenor of the Indian segment. He carried no strategic vision from Jinnah, no financial support, and no roadmap. Just a broken organisation, a name, and a community in trauma.

He also left the money behind. The All India Muslim League had Rs 40 lakh in Habib Bank, Karachi.

Ismail reportedly declined his share of Rs 17 lakh. That one act said everything: the new party would not be funded, directed, or beholden to Pakistan.

On March 10, 1948, at Rajaji Hall in Chennai, Ismail and his colleagues did what Jinnah had failed to do for them. They chose India.

They renamed themselves the Indian Union Muslim League. They rejected the two-nation theory. They adopted a new constitution in 1951 and declared that Indian Muslims belonged to India, not to any global Islamic project. What they could not do was change the name enough. "Muslim League" carried Partition's stench. It would follow them for decades.

The Organisation That Was Already Ready

While the IUML was navigating its political birth, another institution had been quietly building the infrastructure of Muslim community life in Kerala for 22 years.

The Samastha Kerala Jamiyyathul Ulama was founded on June 26, 1926, at Kozhikode Town Hall, under the leadership of Pangil Ahmad Kutty Musliyar, with Varakkal Mullakoya Thangal's blessing. It was born as a defensive reaction, not an expansionary one. The target was the Salafi and reformist movement, specifically Vakkom Moulavi's Kerala Muslim Aikya Sangam, which was pushing to strip what it called superstitions from Islamic practice. To the traditionalist Sunni scholars of Malabar, this was an attack on the Shafi'i way of life that Kerala Muslims had maintained for centuries.

Between 1927 and 1944, it convened 15 annual conferences at different locations, drawing thousands. They organised debates where traditionalist scholars publicly defended practices, saint veneration, and classical Islamic jurisprudence.

In December 1929, Samastha published its first periodical, Al-Bayan, in Arabi-Malayalam script. In 1934, it got formally registered. In 1945, at the 16th conference in Karyavattam, it began keeping systematic records for the first time.

 

comments

No Comments Till Now.

Write Your Story